Geofencing
under review
Ivar-André F. Næss
«Under review» i to år og én dag…🥳🎊🎉
Lars Espen Grubbmo
Ivar-André F. Næss: 🥳🎉
Kristian Høyby
Noe nytt her?
Espen Håland
under review
Anders Bækkeli Lien
Espen Håland: Fantastisk. Noen anelse om hvor lang tid det tar før det er på plass?
Anders Bækkeli Lien
Mikkel Aronsen: Aha😑 Håper de går for det😃
Mikkel Aronsen
Anders Bækkeli Lien: Dette er bare at de vurderer det. Hvis den endres til Planned så blir spørsmålet ditt mer relevant.
Ja jeg håper virkelig de gjør det. Det er et stort antall brukere som ber om dette.
J
Jone Lilleby
Would not reccomend using ARP/IP lists, would rather have using location service or BLE.
Mikkel Aronsen
Jone Lilleby: I think that to make geofencing fast/reliable you need multiple technologies. ARP/IP/MAC-Adresses for inside home detection + Bluetooth low energy tags + phone gps location services for when the phone is outside the home and for longer distance radius detection. All must be individual technology to activate, but function together as one under a geofencing option.
Runar Verwaal
Agree.. list arp/mac address-table and give possibility to add device(s) to monitor whos home.. would be an excellent addition
Eilev Hagen
A possible solution is to add and monitor IP addresses of the phones connected to wifi, like the homey smart presence app
Mikkel Aronsen
It would make the experience for the end user much more unified and would not be reliable of third party apps and services that can have delays or disruption of service. There is also alot of useful ways to integrate geofencing into automations.
Would also be nice with a visual presentation of the people within the geofence area with profile like pictures and the firstname of users.
Tormod Tønnesen
Would be great to skip ifttt and life360 for this!